View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0006061 | MMW v4 | Tracklist | public | 2009-10-18 18:19 | 2009-10-21 16:35 |
| Reporter | user_chrisjj | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | none | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Platform | Windows | OS | XP | OS Version | - |
| Summary | 0006061: Album Art + Details: Artist/Album column label incorrect | ||||
| Description | In "Show Album Art with details" the Artist/Album column shows the Album followed by Artist, so the more correct label is Album/Artist. EDIT: Actually the /more/ more correct label is Album + Artist, I suggest. Reported at http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=43597 | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Fixed in build | |||||
|
|
The intent of the current design is that default sorts by that column are by Artist (primary) / Album (secondary). So perhaps we should change the display of text next to each album to first show Artist and Then Album, but I think that the current view makes more sense. |
|
|
I agree that the sort and display orders should accord, but I expect some users would not welcome a change to display order. |
|
|
if we want to be totally correct, then it should be Album Artist/Album or Album Artist + Album, and show the Album Artist field first and then the album. BUT, we're balancing a couple of items: -the need for the header to fit (it can't be too wide) -the fact that the view is album-centric (and so the album should appear first) -the fact that users will typically want to sort by Artist and secondarily by Album in this view I think that the current arrangement does the best job of balancing these needs, even though it's not not perfectly logical. I think that making it more logical, would interfere with meeting the above needs. |
